ARTICLE

COST EFFECTIVENESS OF TEACHERS WORKING AT GOVERNMENT AND PRIVATE COLLEGES

19 Pages : 343-355

http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2018(III-II).19      10.31703/gssr.2018(III-II).19      Published : Jun 2018

Cost Effectiveness of Teachers Working at Government and Private Colleges

    The paper analyses cost and effectiveness of academic staff working at government and private colleges district Bahawalpur. Therein, it focuses, (a) comparison of cost between private and Government Colleges, (b) finding the sector which readily adopts new trends in education through costeffectiveness, (c) evaluates the use of resources in government and private college in terms of quality efficacy, and (d) compare the achievement in education in government and private sector by utilizing cost-effectiveness analysis. Survey approach was used for data collection. So, two separate questionnaires were developed on a five point Likert scale. Cost and effectiveness in government and private college were then reviewed. The sample was selected from the universe of teachers and Parents of Bahawalpur district. Data were then analysed and presented through means and t-test. Major findings of the study indicated government college teachers’ salary fall between 50,000 to 100,000 and private college salary 20,000 to 50,0000. Majority of teachers in both sectors teach undergraduate and graduate level classes. Very few teachers teach higher level classes. Government college teachers show more flexibility in their behaviour as claimed by respondents, than their private counterparts. Private college did superior work in the category of ethic than Government College. It is observed that private college teachers encourage the students learning by doing in the classroom more than Government College.

    (1) Muhammad Tahir Khan Farooqi
    Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Research and Assessment, University of Okara, Okara, Punjab, Pakistan
    (2) Hafiz Muhammad Ather Khan
    Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Training, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Bahawalpur, Punjab, Pakistan.
    (3) Ghulam Qambar
    PhD Scholar(Education), Department of Educational Research and Assessment, University of Okara, Okara, Pakistan, Pakistan.
  • Dhaliwal, I., Duflo, E., Glennerster, R., & Tulloch, C. (2012, December 3). Comparative Cost Effectiveness Analysis to Inform Policy Developing Countries. A General Framework with Application for Education .
  • McEwan, P. J. (2012). Cost-effectiveness analysis of education and health interventions in Developing Countries. Journal of Development Effectiveness , 4 (2), 189-213.
  • Carpenter, M., & Haggart, A. S. (2003). Cost Effectiveness Analysis for Educational Planing. In M. B. A.Haggart, & D. L.Roberts (Ed.), Planning Urban Education (pp. 169-180). California: The Rand Corporation.
  • Tsang, M. C., Levin, & McEwan, P. (2002). Comparing the Cost of Public and Private Schools in Developing Countries. Thailand: American Education Finance Association.
  • Levin, H. M. & McEwan, P. (2001). Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cost-Effectiveness and Cost-Benefit Analysis . Admine. (2013). Why parents in pakistan prefer private schools for their children. Study aims.
  • Henry, M. L. (1988). Cost-Effectiveness and Educational Policy. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis , 10 (1), 51-69.
  • Barnett, W. (1996). Lives in the Balance. Ypsilanti: High/Scope Press.
  • Tiwari, S. D. (2013). Cost Analysis of Higher Education. International Journal on Recent and Innovation Trends in Computing and Communication , 1 (5), 414-423.
  • Carnoy, M., & Levin, H. M. (1995). Cost- effectiveness Analysis. International Encyclopedia of Economics of Education, 2, 381-386.
  • Latif, K., Shahid, M. N., Sohail, D. N., & Shahbaz, M. (2011, December). Job satisfaction among public and private college teachers of district Faislabad, Pakistan. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary research in bussiness, 3(8), 235.
  • Niazi, H. K., & Mace, J. (2006, December). The contribution of the private sector to higher education in pakistan with particular reference to efficiency and equilty. Bulletin of Education & Research, 28(2), 17-42.
  • Suleman, Q., Aslam, D. H., Habib, M. B., Gillani, U. A., & Hussain, D. I. (2011, Novermber). Effectiveness of the Teacher Training Programmes. International Journal of Humanties and social sciences, 1(16).
  • Usman, S., Akbar, M. T., & Ramzan, M. (2013, sep-Oct). Effect of salary and stress on job satisfaction of Teacher in District sialkot, Pakistan. Journal of Humanties and social science, 15(2), 68-74.

Cite this article

    APA : Farooqi, M. T. K., Khan, H. M. A., & Qambar, G. (2018). Cost Effectiveness of Teachers Working at Government and Private Colleges. Global Social Sciences Review, III(II), 343-355. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2018(III-II).19
    CHICAGO : Farooqi, Muhammad Tahir Khan, Hafiz Muhammad Ather Khan, and Ghulam Qambar. 2018. "Cost Effectiveness of Teachers Working at Government and Private Colleges." Global Social Sciences Review, III (II): 343-355 doi: 10.31703/gssr.2018(III-II).19
    HARVARD : FAROOQI, M. T. K., KHAN, H. M. A. & QAMBAR, G. 2018. Cost Effectiveness of Teachers Working at Government and Private Colleges. Global Social Sciences Review, III, 343-355.
    MHRA : Farooqi, Muhammad Tahir Khan, Hafiz Muhammad Ather Khan, and Ghulam Qambar. 2018. "Cost Effectiveness of Teachers Working at Government and Private Colleges." Global Social Sciences Review, III: 343-355
    MLA : Farooqi, Muhammad Tahir Khan, Hafiz Muhammad Ather Khan, and Ghulam Qambar. "Cost Effectiveness of Teachers Working at Government and Private Colleges." Global Social Sciences Review, III.II (2018): 343-355 Print.
    OXFORD : Farooqi, Muhammad Tahir Khan, Khan, Hafiz Muhammad Ather, and Qambar, Ghulam (2018), "Cost Effectiveness of Teachers Working at Government and Private Colleges", Global Social Sciences Review, III (II), 343-355
    TURABIAN : Farooqi, Muhammad Tahir Khan, Hafiz Muhammad Ather Khan, and Ghulam Qambar. "Cost Effectiveness of Teachers Working at Government and Private Colleges." Global Social Sciences Review III, no. II (2018): 343-355. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2018(III-II).19